What Pride and Prejudice Teachs Us About Character Journeys

The character arcs that keep readers glued to the page

I wish this same advice held for the real world. Alas…

If you’ve never heard of a character arc, you’re not alone. But you probably have a sense of what it is because you read books and you watch films. Not to mention, you’ve seen your best friend finally dump Chad after taking him back 7 times, omg. That was a RIDE. But look at our girl and how she’s grown!

And that is the whole point of a character arc. There are three main categories of arcs, and a whole host of sub categories to choose from. We’re going macro to get the basics down first.

The Positive Character Arc

Ah, the one where they become a better person. This is also the arc that most of us think of first. It’s rags to riches, the bad seed turned philanthropist, Mr. Darcy cutting out all of his bullshit insults to Elizabeth Bennet and becomes a single man in possession of a good fortune who’s actually worth the hassle.

This character either starts off good and grows, or starts off bad and redeems themselves through change. Either way, they follow a similar pattern.

  • The character holds a false belief about something that’s usually in direct conflict with what they truly want.
    • Like that jerk, Mr. Darcy, proclaiming Elizabeth’s tolerable even though she’s obviously not handsome enough to tempt him. LOLZ.
  • The truth is quickly introduced.
    • And damn it, just like that Darcy likes Elizabeth. Albeit against his will, reason, and his very character.
  • A setback ensues.
    • Elizabeth’s having none of these contradictions declarations of love. Against your will? I’ll die penniless, thank you very much.
  • And so, the adventure or quest begins, where the truth of the matter takes over the character’s belief system so completely that they change.
    • In which, Darcy rescues Lydia from that scoundrel Wickham and restores honor to Elizabeth’s family so Elizabeth herself isn’t harmed by the scandal.
    • And that, in turn, changes Elizabeth’s opinion of him.

The Negative Character Arc

This one hits hard because there’s so much hope. There’s so much potential for this to turn itself around. Like your best friend giving Chad chance after chance. The will they/won’t they back and forth is hypnotizing. But even with all the struggle, the reasoning, the bargaining, the pleading for crying out loud, it’s all for not.

This character is either going to fall back into the lie, be disillusioned by it, or become a villain in their own right.

  • The character holds a false belief about something that’s usually supporting some story they’ve been telling themselves, or props up an ideal that they’ve bought hook, line, and sinker.
    • Lydia, Elizabeth Bennet’s flibbertigibbet sister, is so boy crazy that she believes any pretty whisperings in her ear. No matter which rake is whispering them. She’s idealized romance to such a degree that she’s blind to possible pitfalls.
    • It doesn’t help that Mrs. Bennet is desperate to marry her daughters off and the first bidder is just fine with her.
  • The truth is quickly introduced.
    • While Mr. Wickham is in the army and that seems respectable enough, there’s something off about him. But it all has to do with Mr. Darcy, who’s a jackass, so is he bad? Not to Lydia because offscreen Wickham is wooing the dewy-eyed lass.
  • A setback ensues.
    • The reader is fully aware of what it means if Lydia ruins herself. Lydia even knows. And still, she fights for the idea of Wickham. The disillusionment about marriage, and to him in particular, hits a fever pitch.
  • And so, the adventure or quest begins, where the character actively chooses the lie over the truth of the matter.
    • Lydia elopes with that scoundrel Wickham, and threatens dishonor to Elizabeth’s family until she’s rescued by Mr. Darcy and he sets the whole thing right.

The Flat Character Arc

But I thought you said the character had to change? What’s this flat arc business? Change here happens because of the character. While we might think that super hero stories would fit into the Positive Character Arc, superheroes don’t grow and only occasionally have to redeem themselves. They’re super in the beginning and they stay super. That’s why we watch every Knives Out film and read every Hercule Poirot novel. That’s why Marvel is blockbuster franchise. This character is reliable.

That means, this arc requires a ton of characterization upfront. While this can be a main character like James Bond, they’re often supporting cast and act as foils, comic relief, or a point of contrast to the other characters who are changing.

  • The character already knows the truth. The internal battle here is being able to maintain that truth.
    • Enter Mr. Collins, the idiotic social climbing clergyman and his incessant rambling about Lady Catherine De Bourgh. He believes that he’s really something important because of who he’s connected to, and he’s determined that everyone else does as well.
  • The truth is quickly tested.
    • Mr. Collins sets his cap at marrying Elizabeth Bennett. Only our girl is having none of it. After a lengthy and rambling sales pitch proposal, Elizabeth rejects him again and again.
      • “I am perfectly serious in my refusal. You could not make me happy, and I am convinced that I am the last woman in the world who could make you so.” OUCH. But does it change his belief? Nope.
  • And so, the quest begins to find another character who will either believe the same truth with him or let him continue believing it. ie – Changing the conditions, or the story around him, to keep the truth alive.
    • Hello, Charlotte Lucas.
      • 27 years old.
      • No money.
      • No prospects.
      • A burden to her parents.
      • Frightened.
    • Charlotte sees Mr. Collins as a means of survival, and arranges their home and married life in such a way that sees him as little as possible.
    • This marriage keeps Mr. Collins truth alive. That’s he’s a real somebody.
    • We also see Elizabeth and Jane marry well, and the contrast is startling.

A note on plotting

Now you might be thinking, holy hell. I’ve got to plot a character and plot a plot and plot the timeline and, and, and. That can feel like a ton at first, but here’s where it gets good. These plots take care of each other. When you find a character’s motivation, their beliefs and values, and what they want, the Plot plot starts to write itself. Because the ways in which you can complicate this character’s life become very clear.

So. Deep breath. You’ve got this.

“Read” this post as a YouTube video instead, if you’re so inclined!

Join our Writing Community Hour over on The Rogue MFA YouTube channel (which meets every other Thursday evening at 4pm PST/ 7pm EST), where we’ll be building routine and community with YOU. Subscribe to get notified, and if you’re even a little bit interested, please fill out our quick survey so we can expand these in the future with you in mind.

Read More

Why Your Characters Feel Flat and How to Fix It

And how to Frankenstein them all together to, hopefully, better outcomes. Or not.

Some of my favorite stories have the most vivid and complicated characters, and I’m guessing yours do too. When a character is so singular, we can’t help but fall in love. Last week, Bri set us up with a character interview. And today, I’m going to show you a few pillars of character development that will help you turn your red-headed orphan into Anne of Green Gables.

AKA – WHY are we filling out that character interview in the first place?

Establish Your Character’s Credibility

Credibility helps your readers understand what’s normal for this character, the world they live in, and how they navigate it. This is why stereotypes are so powerful. Right or wrong, they become a shorthand for what we expect from a certain type of person.

For example: The owner of an international big box store vs. the owner of a Mom & Pop general store in a farming community of 1,000 people. Same type of job, radically different type of person. Establishing a type is simply a building block that you can use to carve your unique character out of.

Ways to establish credibility:

  • What’s appropriate for this character? And by that, I mean – what’s a reasonable expectation for this type of character?
  • What’s the social/biological breakdown? Gender, race, class, age – all the ways humans discriminate against one another. Ew, gross, but also important to know because…
    • If you leave these details out, the story will be slow to take off because readers, right or wrong, can’t get a grasp on who this person is supposed to be or how they’re supposed to act.
    • Establish this early, so you can immediately correct the record for how this character acts, and then uphold or subvert expectations.

Establish Your Character’s Purpose

Understanding the reason this character is in the narrative gives us something to hope for, and helps establish the direction the story might go. All of this props up the reader’s expectations, which you can immediately subvert or not.

Ways to establish purpose:

  • Determine what your character wants. Are they looking for love, or to cope with the suffocating small town life they’re living, or to help other people escape enemy occupied territory?
  • What’s the point of having this character in the narrative at all? Which, I admit, sounds a little existential, but understanding their role in your story also illuminates the kind of character they are or can be.
    • Not everyone has MC energy and that’s a good thing.

Establish Your Character’s Complexity

Complexity is what makes us love a character, grip the pages with wide eyes as they make very out of character decisions, which reveals their ability to change and grow over the course of the story. While they don’t have to have the range of a yo-yo, they do need some flexibility in their decision making. It’s most fun when a character is downright confounding at times. When they spiral of their axis. When they finally do the thing they’ve been resisting, believe in themselves, or take the big risk.

Ways to establish complexity:

  • Determine your character’s values. They might hold onto certain rules about life right up until the thing or person they love most is threatened. Then it all goes out the window.
  • Determine your character’s beliefs. If they hold something to be incorruptible, and operate from that belief set, you open a whole host of opportunities for that belief system to fail or be abandoned. That makes them human and full of nuance.
  • Determine your character’s strengths. Are they a wizard with language but an absolute dunce when it comes to relationships?
    • Where do they shine, and where does it makes sense that they should shine, but don’t?

Most readers aren’t looking for that perfect hero or heroine, but a real messy human in all their glory. Because at the end of the day, we’re all complex, nuanced, and hoping like hell we aren’t failing too badly. When we see that on the page, it reaffirms that we’re all in this together.

“Read” this post as a YouTube video instead, if you’re so inclined!

Join our Writing Community Hour over on The Rogue MFA YouTube channel (which meets every other Thursday evening at 4pm PST/ 7pm EST), where we’ll be building routine and community with YOU. Subscribe to get notified, and if you’re even a little bit interested, please fill out our quick survey so we can expand these in the future with you in mind.

Read More

Let’s Fix Your Novel’s Saggy Middle

Oh, I’ve been there. Languishing in those blasted middle chapters and wondering, but how do I get to that climactic end scene that’s so clear in my mind?

Out, damned mushy middle! – The Bard. Or something along those lines.

Our goal is to get through the center of your novel, and not with a heavy Phew! at the end. But with intention. In a way that keeps readers engaged in your story, and that makes the ending believable and feel earned. Not only will structure give parameters around which story elements go where, but most importantly, it helps you through that dastardly middle where everything tries to go sideways. Or worse, stalls.

We’ve even created a guided worksheet to help you plan your story using the 5 act play, or use this structure as a diagnostic tool for your completed manuscript.

Enter Stage Left: The Classic 5 Act Play

Because I tend to be a more plot-driven writer, I love the 5 act play structure. Using the 5 Act Play can keep you on course, especially when you’re a bit of a planner and a pantser all in one. I’m going to use A Gentleman in Moscow for my example because it’s set up in 5 books within the novel.

Notes before we begin:

  • I’m well aware that this is a character driven novel. The structure still works.
  • There will be spoilers. And honestly, if you haven’t read this book by now what’s the hold up?
  • A Gentleman in Moscow exceeds 100k words.

Because you might be writing your debut, you already know how vital it is to stay between 80 and 100k words. While I’m outlining AGIM, I’m doing the math for a debut novel. The numbers aren’t set in stone, but are very helpful guidelines.

Act One

Set up the story, the primary characters, the setting and time, and the inciting incident (that will be resolved in the final act). This covers about 10% of the story or 10k words.

  • Inciting incident: Count Rostov is given a life sentence of house arrest and imprisoned in the Metropol Hotel – all because of a subversive poem that’s been attributed to him.
  • We meet a few of the staff and hotel guests who will be with him for the ride, most notably Nina. She’s 9, and she shows Rostov the inner workings of the hotel, and also gives him a master key to the place.
  • We get our first glimpse of the hotel antagonist, The Bishop, who grates on Rostov because he’s a terrible waiter. Lolz. What a snob.
  • The stakes are defined – life of death. If Rostov steps one foot outside the hotel, he’ll be shot.

Act Two

The protagonist begins their move toward the conclusion. Yes, already here. Most of the characters (At least 90%) must be introduced by the end of this act. The most significant complications to the narrative are also seeded here. This covers about 30% of the story, or 30k words.

  • We meet Anna Urbanova, the willowy silver screen darling who Rostov tumbles into bed with. But she’s only in town off and on.
  • The antagonist, The Bishop, becomes a greater threat. He’s promoted in the hotel, and begins to actively poke at Rostov, complicating his house arrest.
  • Mishka, a radical old friend of Rostov’s visits and we learn he’s dating a woman named Katerina. Seems benign. It’s absolutely not.
  • Nina, now 13, will be leaving the Metropol Hotel soon. Rostov gets progressively more depressed and decides to take his own life, but his plan is foiled. The reader is reminded of the stakes.

Act Three

Characters are on a path toward the point of no return. The complications of the story escalate, and additional pressures/stakes present themselves. Characters move into place, and situations arise that will help resolve the inciting incident. This is about 20% of the story, or 20k words.

  • Rostov and Anna start seeing each other regularly.
  • Rostov takes a position at the hotel restaurant and helps plan restaurant activities. There, he befriends Osip, who asks Rostov to show him the manners and ways of the noble class. Seems benign. Absolutely is not.
  • Nina, now a woman, visits the hotel and asks Rostov to watch her small daughter, Sofia, for an afternoon. Nina is arrested and never returns. Rostov enlists the hotel staff to help him raise Sofia.
  • When Sofia turns 13, she falls on the stairs and Rostov leaves the hotel to take her to the hospital. Osip helps him get back into the hotel, but the stakes are tested and Rostov is nearly caught.

Act Four

Revelations come forward, secrets get spilled, and something must change for your characters or they must make a very scary decision. The story builds steam, and pressure, for the crisis or inflection point. This is about 35% of the story, or 35k words.

  • Sofia, now 17, has become a world class pianist thanks to her instructor, Viktor.
  • Katerina tells Rostov that Mishka has died. Rostov confides in her that the poem that made him famous, and also landed him on house arrest, was written by Mishka. She gives him Mishka’s final writings – work even more subversive than the OG poem.
  • The Bishop is on a mission to make Rostov’s life a living hell, and they now absolutely hate each other. If The Bishop learns that Rostov has Mishka’s ultra damning work in his possession, he’s done for. Rostov must escape.

Act Five

The Conclusion/Climax/Catastrophe. Characters either die or get married. The hero is going to prevail or not. Either way, the inciting incident must be resolved. It’s the last 5% of the story, or 5k words.

  • Sofia has been invited to Paris to perform a piano recital. Rostov has a letter delivered to Richard, an American in Paris, who had asked him to be a spy decades ago but Rostov refused. Even so, they remained friends.
  • Rostov oversees a dinner at the hotel, and notes the seating arrangement of the high ranking Soviet officials and their power dynamics. He also creates a map and gives it to Sofia before she leaves for Paris.
  • Rostov locks The Bishop in a storage room in the basement the night of Sofia’s recital. Afterward, she uses the map to contact Richard in Paris and gives him the seating arrangement.
  • Inciting incident resolved: Richard floods the hotel’s switchboard, creating a diversion so Rostov can leave the hotel. Viktor dresses identically to Rostov, and creates another diversion at the train station, allowing the Count to escape Moscow.
  • When Rostov arrives to his family’s estate, their mansion has been burned down, but the willowy Anna Urbanova is waiting for him in a nearby tavern.

Instead of wandering the desert (the damned middle) for 40 days and nights, you can start seeding ideas, building pressure, and moving your characters into position for the finale. And thanks to Shakespeare, you now have a rough plan for how to do it.

How to Implement This Strategy

  • You can outline your entire book using this structure and then chip away at your chapters, making sure that each act is doing what it’s meant to do.
    • You can set up loose parameters and pants your way through each act, create a chapter by chapter breakdown, or something in between. Do what works for you while also keeping in service to your book.
  • If you’ve completed a draft, you can go back and section it off by approx word count and see if your sections are doing the work they need to do in each act. Then ask:
    • How can I move what I’ve already written around so it works harder for this story?
    • Which parts are lovely to read but aren’t really pulling their weight narratively?
      • Do they get the axe or can they be reworked to make this story sing?

A word of caution/a diagnostic tool: The percentage/page count is flexible. But if you go too far beyond it, your reader will start to ask: Where is this going? And so…? What’s the point of this? And eventually – Who cares?

Even A Gentleman in Moscow runs longer than these suggestions, and while I love the book, it’s a reason why it’s DNF’d. Readers often cite it as too slow – aka – where the F is this story going?

5 Act play too structured? Bri’s uses thematic story structuring and gives us the full breakdown next week.

Read this post as a video:


Now is the best time to start evaluating your novel’s structure. And the second best time is during our Writing Community Hour over on The Rogue MFA YouTube channel every other Thursday evening at 4pm PST/ 7pm EST. The full calendar of dates is on our Community page.  Subscribe to get notified, and if you’re interested, please fill out our quick survey so we can expand these in the future with you in mind.

Read More